Diferenças

Aqui você vê as diferenças entre duas revisões dessa página.

--- opensci:2025:rafael:art1 [2025/03/30 21:22] – criada rafael
+++ opensci:2025:rafael:art1 [2025/04/01 23:33] (atual) – rafael
@@ Linha 1: / Linha 1: @@
-====== Public Repository of Scientific Data: the case of FigShare ======
+====== Public Repositories of Scientific Data: the case of FigShare ======
 ----
@@ Linha 7: / Linha 7: @@
-**Scientific Paper Description**: In FigShare Platform, we used raw data from a paper entitled:   [[https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Agroforestry_Practices_Promote_Biodiversity_and_Natural_Resource_Diversity_in_Atlantic_Nicaragua/3814896|"Agroforestry Practices Promote Biodiversity and Natural Resource Diversity in Atlantic Nicaragua"]]. In this research, the authors assessed soil quality and diversity attributes, comparing agroforestry systems with secondary forest and pasture, in Nicaragua. To this end, they performed several samplings on many farms. In these farms, they observed four types of agroforestry systems (AFS): Cacao domint AFS, Coconut dominant AFS, Plantain dominant AFS and Mixed fruits AFS. To make the assessments simpler, the authors shrunk the data from the different AFS, turning them one single group to be compared to Forest and Pature.
+**Scientific Paper Description**: In FigShare Platform, we used raw data from a paper entitled:   [[https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Agroforestry_Practices_Promote_Biodiversity_and_Natural_Resource_Diversity_in_Atlantic_Nicaragua/3814896|"Agroforestry Practices Promote Biodiversity and Natural Resource Diversity in Atlantic Nicaragua"]]. In this research, the authors assessed soil quality and diversity attributes, comparing agroforestry systems with secondary forest and pasture, in Nicaragua. To this end, they performed several samplings on many farms. In these farms, they observed four types of agroforestry systems (AFS): Cacao domint AFS, Coconut dominant AFS, Plantain dominant AFS and Mixed fruits AFS. To make the assessments simpler, the authors shrunk the data from the different AFS, turning them one single group to be compared to Forest and Pature. Some examples of the results obtained by this paper area presented below.
+{{:opensci:2025:rafael:soil_analysis_paper_1.jpg?300|}}
+{{:opensci:2025:rafael:soil_analysis_paper_2.jpg?300|}}
 **A Different Approach Proposal**:  Although they have found some interesting outcomes, we believe the raw data were underutilized, especially by shrinking the AFS groups into only one group. Therefore, we tried to propose an alternative assessment approach using the raw data of this paper, for the following soil variables: C and N concentration and stock, C/N ratio, soil bulk density and soil pH. By performing this new assessment, we found significant differences between the different AFS, denoting these systems need to be evaluated differently.
@@ Linha 18: / Linha 21: @@
 **Plots Generated**
-{{ opensci:2024:arthur:mapa_figshare.png?500|}}
+{{:opensci:2025:rafael:boxplot_bulk_density.png?300|}}  {{:opensci:2025:rafael:boxplot_cconc.png?300|}}
+{{:opensci:2025:rafael:boxplot_cstock.png?300|}}  {{:opensci:2025:rafael:boxplot_cton.png?300|}}
+{{:opensci:2025:rafael:boxplot_nconc.png?300|}}  {{:opensci:2025:rafael:boxplot_nstock.png?300|}}
+{{:opensci:2025:rafael:boxplot_ph.png?300|}}
+{{:opensci:2025:rafael:pca_biplot.png?400|}}
-{{ opensci:2024:arthur:grafico_figshare.png?500|}}